|
Medicaid version 65.1
Version History
|
Medicaid provides health insurance to low-income individuals. The groups
primarily served are the elderly, the disabled, and families with children,
although other adults may also be covered. States may extend additional
coverage to children and adults via SCHIP.
TRIM3's Medicaid/SCHIP module simulates eligibility for Medicaid and State
Children's Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP), identifies which eligible
individuals are actually enrolled in the program, and assigns the insurance
value of Medicaid eligibility. Eligibility is simulated on a monthly basis --
each person is checked for eligibility in each month of the simulation year. A
person might be found eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP in some months of the year
but not the entire year. The eligibility rules are simulated in great detail,
including the variations in eligibility rules across states. The module is able
to simulate both the rules that were in effect prior to the passage of the
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 (PRWORA) and the rules
in place after PRWORA, including the post-PRWORA "Section 1931" eligibility
rules. Like all TRIM3 modules, the Medicaid and SCHIP module can also simulate
hypothetical Medicaid and SCHIP rules.
There are some features of the Medicaid and SCHIP programs that TRIM3 does not
model. TRIM3 does not simulate eligibility for the institutionalized since they
are not in the CPS universe. Further, children under age 15 generally
cannot be simulated as eligible by disability, since they do not report their
income and labor force information necessary to identify disability. However,
the SSI module uses a special imputation process to identify certain children
under 15 as receiving SSI. Only these children can be simulated by Medicaid as
eligible by disability. The module does not simulate transitional Medicaid
benefits for those families no longer receiving cash Temporary Assistance to
Needy Families (TANF) benefits due to increased income, increased employment,
time limits, or other reasons.
This document describes the operation of the Medicaid and SCHIP module in
detail. Note that the discussion refers to the many different "program rules"
that control the operation of each TRIM3 Medicaid/SCHIP simulation. Details on
each program rule and its potential values can be obtained from the TRIM3 Data
Dictionary. The discussion is organized as follows:
Filing Unit
For Medicaid, the concept of a filing unit is not as useful as it is in the
other tax and transfer programs. Although the family (subfamilies separate)
comes closest to providing a useful concept of a filing unit, at many points in
the simulation such a definition breaks down and it becomes more useful to
define the unit as a married couple or as just an individual. Consequently, in
this discussion of TRIM3's simulation of medicaid, we generally refer to the
eligibility of a person, rather than of a unit, while at the same time pointing
out those places where the eligibility of the person is affected by other
people in the household.
As indicated above, when reference is made to "family", subfamilies (both
related and unrelated) are treated as separate families. However, in some
states, certain types of adults -- step parents, unmarried parents, and
non-parent partners -- are treated differently than others when determining
family composition. Begining with the March 2007 CPS (the input data for the
2006 simulation year), TRIM is able to identify these types of adults, and so
is able to model the different treatments. The rules in the subcategory Parents
determine how such persons are treated, and the result variables in the output
category Parents contain some of the results of the processing (details).
Overview of Eligibility Determination
Medicaid provides numerous possible paths to eligibility. The various
eligibility paths can be grouped into 4 broad categories -- Mandatory,
Optional, SCHIP, and Medically Needy. This document handles each of these
categories separately, and presents a detailed description of each of the
eligibility paths in each of the categories. When appropriate, a path is
described using the standard concepts of categorical, asset, and income
eligibility. However, many paths are best described by not strictly following
this convention -- for example, paths that are largely based upon a person's
eligibility for SSI or TANF/AFDC .
Note that in TRIM's terminology, an "eligible" person is someone who has passed
all eligibility tests in a particular path, regardless of whether he/she
actually enrolls to receive those benefits. In some administrative data,
"eligible" means someone who not only passes eligibility tests, but took the
further step of obtaining a Medicaid card (although they may not have actually
used the card to obtain benefits). In TRIM3's terminology, this is a person who
is "enrolled".
Monthly and Annual Eligibility
The eligibility paths are described below in the order in which they are applied
(although the rule HierarchyOption can be used to modify the order).
In each month, the first eligibility path that makes a person eligible becomes
that person's eligibility type for that month, and no further eligibility
testing is performed for that month. A person's monthly eligibility type is
stored in the result variable EligibilityType
. It is possible for a person to be eligible through different paths in
different months of the year, and different members of the same family may be
eligible under different paths.
A person's annual eligibility type is stored in AnnualEligibilityType.
Persons are categorized as eligible on an annual basis using an "ever-on"
concept - if an individual is eligible for at least one month, s/he is
considered to be eligible on an annual basis as well. If the type of
eligibility varies from month to month, the monthly types are grouped into the
following hierarchy of categories, and the type in the highest level (i.e.
lowest number) is assigned as the annual type:
-
Mandatory eligibility
-
Optional eligibility
-
SCHIP eligibility
-
Medically Needy
If a tie, the type from the earliest of the tied months is chosen -- although
for ties among mandatory types, months where the person received TANF/AFDC or
SSI benefits are chosen over other mandatory months
Non-Citizen Eligibility
Before a non-citizen can be considered for any of the medicaid eligibility
paths, he/she must meet medicaid's non-citizen eligibility requirements.
Medicaid follows the same procedure for determining non-citizen eligibility as
other TRIM3 simulation modules (click here for
details). The only modification Medicaid makes to this method is that
the national-level rule TempAlienEligible is replaced by the
state-level rule StateTempAlienEligible.
Legal aliens are eligible for Medicaid if they have been in the US for at least the
number of years specified in the state-level rule EligIfInUSNumberOfYears
and if they pass the sponsor deeming test.
The CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) gives states the option to allow
otherwise eligible legal immigrant children and pregnant women to be covered under
Medicaid and optionally CHIP regardless of how long they have been in the country.
The state-level rule CHIPRA214 specifies if a state does apply CHIPRA and
whether it applies to children (persons under 21), pregnant women, or both.
Immigrants eligible via this option are not subject to the sponsor deeming test.
Assets
When the Medicaid module needs to measure assets, one of three methods is used:
-
The asset measure calculated for SSI eligibility is used, which is passed from
the SSI simulation via the rule SSISimulatedUnitAssets.
-
The asset measure calculated for TANF/AFDC eligibility is used, which is passed
from the TANF/AFDC simulation via the rule AFDCAssetsOfUnit.
-
The mediciad module calculates its own measure of assets. The income amounts
specified by the rules FamilyAssetIncome or FamilyAssetIncomeReporters
are summed for all members of the family (related subfamilies are treated as
separate families). The result of this computation is stored in the monthly
result variable MonthlyFamilyAssetIncome. To convert asset income into
actual assets, this amount is divided by an assumed rate of return of 6% to
come up with an implied value of assets. In addition, any lump-sum income (LumpSumIncomVars)
that is to be treated as assets (LumpSumTreatment) is added.
The particular method used, as well as the limits against which the assets are
compared, is specified in each eligibility path's description. Note that the
rule AssetLimitAdjustment can be used to increase or decrease all
asset limits across the board.
Income
When the Medicaid module needs to measure income, one of three methods is used:
-
The income measure calculated for SSI eligibility is used, which is passed from
the SSI simulation via the rule SSISimulatedAvailableIncome.
-
The income measure calculated for TANF/AFDC eligibility is used, which is
passed from the TANF/AFDC simulation via the rule AFDCNetIncomeOfUnit.
-
The medicaid module calculates its own measure of income. The income amounts
specified by the rules FamilyEarnedIncome, FamilyChildSupportIncome,
and FamilyUnearnedIncome are summed for all persons in the family
(related subfamilies are treated as separate families). The program rule ApplyIncomeSmoothing
can be used to "smooth" monthly fluctuations in earned income (Click
here for details). The result of this computation is stored in the
monthly result variable FamilyIncome. Particular eligibilty paths
may make further adjustments to this amount.
The particular method used, as well as the limits against which the income is
compared, is specified in each eligibility path's description.
Unrelated Children
Some children on the CPS are not related to any adults in the household. Since
the income and asset level of children is generally based on the income
received by their parents/guardians, TRIM is unable to determine if these
"unrelated children" are income/asset eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP.
Consequently, it is left up to the user to decide how TRIM should handle these
children. If the national-level rule UnrelatedChildOption is turned on
(i.e. set to "1"), then these children are automatically considered to be
eligible without any eligibility tests being performed (they are assigned an
eligibility type code of 80 -- "Unrelated Child"). If this rule is turned off,
all unrelated children are entirely excluded from Medicaid and SCHIP
eligibility. Note that this rule only applies to unrelated children under age
15. Older unrelated children are treated the same as single adults.
Mandatory Eligibility
Mandatory eligibles are persons who must (by federal law) be covered in all
states. The following eligibility paths are included in the mandatory category:
TANF/AFDC Cash Eligibility (eligibility type 1)
Before the passage of PRWORA, all recipients of TANF/AFDC were automatically
eligible for Medicaid. Information about the amount of TANF/AFDC benefits a
person is simulated to receive is passed to the Medicaid module via the program
rule AFDCBenefitsReceived. Any person simulated to receive benefits (AFDCBenefitsReceived
> 0) is considered eligible for Medicaid.
The rule AfdcAutoElig allows the user to disable this eligibility path.
This path should be disabled when simulating post-PRWORA rules.
SSI Cash Eligibility (eligibility types 3-6)
Receipt of federally funded SSI benefits (as opposed to
supplemental state benefits) automatically makes an individual eligible for
Medicaid. Unlike TANF/AFDC receipt, this rule was maintained after PRWORA.
Information about SSI benefits received is passed from the SSI simulation via
the program rules SSIBenefitsReceived and SSIFederalBenefitsEligFor.
Any person simulated to receive benefits (SSIBenefitsReceived > 0)
and some or all of those benefits were federal benefits (SSIFederalBenefitsEligFor
> 0) is considered eligible for Medicaid. Information regarding the type of SSI
unit the person belongs to (and hence which of the medicaid eligibility types
-- 3 thru 6 -- to assign to the person) is passed from the SSI simulation via
the rule SSIUnitType
.
For a few states, the asset and income tests applied in this path are actually
more strict than those applied in the baseline SSI simulation. States that have
expanded their SSI eligibility rules since 1972 are permitted to deny Medicaid
eligibility to SSI recipients who would not have been eligible under their
state's more restrictive 1972 rules. This restriction is referred to as "Rule
209B", and is the only case in which a federally funded SSI recipient is denied
Medicaid eligibility in TRIM3. The rules beginning with Rule209B... are
used to indicate which states have the 209b rule in effect, as well as the
levels of those more restrictive income and asset limits. Rule209BIncomeLimitSize1
and Rule209BAssetLimitSize1 give the 209b asset and income limits for
one-person SSI units, and Rule209BIncomeLimitSize2 and Rule209BAssetLimitSize2
give that information for two-person SSI units. The measures of income and
assets calculated by the SSI module are used when determining if the 209b
requirements are met. These amounts are passed from the SSI simulation via the
rules SSISimulatedAvailableIncome and SSISimulatedUnitAssets
.
The program rule SSICashOption gives the user the option of disabling
this eligibility path.
Section 1931 Mandatory Eligibility (eligibility type 90)
The 1996 PRWORA act added a section "1931" to the Social Security Act, which
made it mandatory for states to provide Medicaid coverage to low-income
families who meet the pre-PRWORA AFDC income and resource standards and other
requirements that were in effect on July 16, 1996. TRIM3 simulates this
mandatory aspect of Section 1931 eligibility by performing a special run of the
TANF/AFDC module that simulates each state's 1996 AFDC eligibility requirements
, including complex rules for income disregards (excluding certain types of
income such as child care or work expenses when determining eligibility), asset
testing (including the value of certain assets when determining eligibility),
and categorical eligibility requirements. The results of this special run are
accessed by the Medicaid module via the program rule Mandatory1931Eligible.
Anyone simulated to be eligible for TANF/AFDC in the special run (i.e. Mandatory1931Eligible
> 0) is considered eligible for medicaid. Note that only TANF/AFDC eligibility,
not participation
, is required in this special run.
The rule Other1931Eligible
can be used to specify alternative methods for achieving 1931 eligibility.
Note: For the 1997 and 1998 baseline simulations of medicaid,
1931 eligibility was simulated in a simplified form (click
here for details).
TANF/AFDC Near-Cash Eligibility (eligibility type
22)
Before the passage of PRWORA, persons who pass all of their state's TANF/AFDC
eligibility requirements but who are only eligible for an amount of benefits
below the program's minimum benefit requirement, were
automatically eligible for Medicaid. Information on whether the TANF/AFDC
eligibility tests are passed is given to the Medicaid module via the following
rules:
-
AFDCPassParentTest
-
AFDCPassAssetTest
-
AFDCPassGrossIncomeTest
-
AFDCPassNetIncomeTest
Information about the amount of TANF/AFDC benefits which a person is eligible
for below the minimum amount is passed to the Medicaid module
via the program rule BenefitsUnitEligForBelowMin. If a person passes
the TANF/AFDC eligibility tests and is eligible for an amount of benefit below
the minimum (i.e. BenefitsUnitEligForBelowMin > 0) is considered
eligible for medicaid.
ACA Eligibility (eligibility type 29)
Under the ACA, starting in 2014 all non-elderly persons below a certain percent of poverty
(specified in program rule ACAMandPct) must be covered by Medicaid.
The determination of percent-of-poverty for this eligibility
pathway is based on the tax unit's modified AGI (MAGI). A unit's percent-of-poverty is calculated
on an annual basis by TRIM's FederalTax module and written out as a result variable.
The variablelist rule ACAMAGI is used to reference this result variable. The
tax unit ids have to be provided in the variablelist rule ACAUnitID.
Percent of Poverty Eligibility (eligibility types 42-45)
The federal government mandates that certain persons be covered by Medicaid if
their family's income is below a specified percent of poverty. To be eligible
through this path, individuals must pass the following tests:
-
Categorical eligibility: The individual must be either
pregnant, an infant (i.e. age = 0), or a young child (i.e. not an infant but
under the age limit specified by either the rule PovBasedMandAgeForChildren1
or PovBasedMandAgeForChildren2).
-
Asset test: If the person is a pregnant woman or an infant,
their family's assets must not exceed the level specified by the program rule PovBasedMandAssetForPregAndInf.
If the person is a young child, their family's assets must not exceed the level
specified by the program rule PovBasedMandAssetForChildren1 (if they
are under the age specified by PovBasedMandAgeForChildren1) or by the
program rule PovBasedMandAssetForChildren2 (if they are under the age
specified by PovBasedMandAgeForChildren1). The measure of assets used
depends upon the setting of the rule IncomeCalculationType, which in
turn depends upon whether PRWORA rules are being simulated:
-
Post-PRWORA (IncomeCalculationType = 1):
Medicaid's own measure of assets is used.
-
Pre-PRWORA (IncomeCalculationType = 0): The asset
measure calculated for TANF/AFDC eligibility is used, which is passed from the
TANF/AFDC simulation via the rule AFDCAssetsOfUnit. For persons
not members of an TANF/AFDC unit, medicaid's own measure is used.
-
Income test: If the person is a pregnant woman, the family's
income as a percent of poverty must not exceed the level specified by the
program rule PovBasedMandPctForPregnant. If the person is an infant,
the level is specified by the program rule PovBasedMandPctForInfants.
For young children, the level is specified by either PovBasedMandPctForChildren1
(if under the age specified by PovBasedMandAgeForChildren1) or by PovBasedMandPctForChildren2
(if under the age specified by PovBasedMandAgeForChildren1). The
measure of income used depends upon the setting of the rule IncomeCalculationType,
which in turn depends upon whether PRWORA rules are being simulated:
-
Post-PRWORA (IncomeCalculationType = 1): Medicaid's
own measure of income is modified by adding any income TANF/AFDC considered
deemed to the family (AfdcDeemedIncome) and any lump-sum income (LumpSumIncomVars)
that is to be treated as income (LumpSumTreatment). Beginning with version 56.5
of the Medicaid module SSI and TANF/AFDC benefits received by the family
(SSIBenefitsReceived, AFDCBenefitsReceived) are not treated as income.
To include SSI and TANF benefits in income one has to specify Opt #6
in the DebugOptions.
This new income amount is then reduced by the deductions and disregards
specified by several state-specific rules. A fixed amount is disregard from
earnings (FamilyEarningsFixedDisregard), a fraction is disregard from
the remainder (FamilyEarningsFractDisregard), a fixed amount is
disregarded from child support income (FamilyChildSupportDisregard),
and a fixed amount of child care expenses is disregarded from the result(FamilyChildCareExpDisregard).
Note that in the Medicaid module, these disregards and deductions are applied
to the entire year even if in the "real world" the disregards are only applied
to part of the year (for example, the first four months).
-
Pre-PRWORA (IncomeCalculationType = 0): The income of
the person as determined for TANF/AFDC eligibility is used. This amount is
passed from the TANF/AFDC simulation via the rule AFDCNetIncomeOfUnit.
For persons not members of an TANF/AFDC unit, medicaid's own measure is used.
State Optional Eligibility
State optional eligibles are persons who states may cover under
guidelines established by the federal government. Some of the eligibility paths
in this category are similiar to the mandatory pathways, while some are unique
to this category.
Section 1931 Optional Eligibility (eligibility type 91)
As discussed in the section on "Mandatory" eligibility, Section 1931 of the
Social Security Act requires that a state cover persons who meet the 1996 AFDC
requirements for eligibility. However, states can diverge from the AFDC plans
in effect on July 16, 1996 as follows:
-
States have the option to lower their income standards, but not below the AFDC
standards in effect as of May 1, 1988.
-
States have the option to increase their income or resource standards based on
a percentage that does not exceed the percentage increases in the Consumer
Price Index that have occurred since July 16, 1996.
-
States have the option to use income and resource methodologies that are less
restrictive than those used under the AFDC State plan as of July 16, 1996.
TRIM3 simulates this optional aspect of Section 1931 eligibility by performing
yet another special run of the TANF module that capture each state's extension
(if any) to the mandatory requirements. The results of this special run are
accessed by the Medicaid module via the program rule Optional1931Eligible.
Anyone simulated to be eligible for TANF in the special run (i.e. Optional1931Eligible
> 0) is considered eligible for medicaid.
The rule Other1931Eligible
can be used to specify alternative methods for achieving 1931 eligibility.
Note: For the 1997 and 1998 baseline simulations of medicaid,
1931 eligibility was simulated in a simplified form (click
here for details).
TANF/AFDC Child-only Eligibility (eligibility type
81)
Regardless of whether pre or post-PRWORA rules are being simulated, TANF/AFDC
recipients who are part of a child-only unit are simulated to be eligible if
the rule TANFChildOnlyEligibility indicates so. Information about the
type of TANF/AFDC unit a person belongs to is passed to Medicaid via the rule AFDCUnitType,
while information on TANF/AFDC receipt is passed via AFDCBenefitsReceived.
SSI Cash Supplements Eligibility (eligibility
types 7-10)
As described in the "Mandatory" section, persons who are receiving federal SSI
benefits must be covered by a state's Medicaid program. States may
extend Medicaid eligibility to persons who, while not receiving federal SSI
benefits, are receiving state supplements. The program rule DoesSSIStateSupQualifyForMcaid
indicates for each state whether or not it offers this extension. Information
about a person's receipt of state supplements is passed from the SSI simulation
via the program rules SSIBenefitsReceived and SSIFederalBenefitsEligFor.
A person for whom SSIBenefitsReceived > 0 but SSIFederalBenefitsEligFor
= 0 is receiving only state supplements. Information regarding the type of SSI
unit the person belongs to (and hence which of the medicaid eligibility types
-- 7 thru 10 -- to assign to the person) is passed from the SSI simulation via
the rule SSIUnitType
.
As is the case with mandatory SSI eligibility, optional eligibility is denied to
persons who fail to meet their state's "Rule
209b" restrictions (if any).
TANF/AFDC non-cash Eligibility (eligibility type 11)
Before PRWORA, states had the option to extend Medicaid eligibility to
individuals eligible for TANF/AFDC benefits but not receiving any. In TRIM3,
the rule DoesAFDCEligQualifyForMedicaid is used to indicate which
states extend Medicaid eligibility to eligible non-recipients. Information on
whether the TANF/AFDC eligibility tests are passed is given to the Medicaid
module from the TANF/AFDC module via the following rules:
-
AFDCPassParentTest
-
AFDCPassAssetTest
-
AFDCPassGrossIncomeTest
-
AFDCPassNetIncomeTest
Note that the person must also pass the minimum benefit requirement for
TANF/AFDC . This information is passed from the TANF/AFDC simulation via the
rule AFDCBenefitsEligFor (a value greater than 0 indicates that the
benefit test was passed).
SSI non-cash Eligibility (eligibility types 12-19)
States may also extend Medicaid eligibility to persons who, while not receiving
any SSI benefits (neither federal nor state), are eligible for either federal
benefits or state supplements. The program rule DoesSSIEligQualifyForMedicaid
indicates for each state whether or not it offers this extensions. Information
about a person's eligibility for federal or state SSI is passed from the SSI
simulation via the program rules SsiBenefitsEligibleFor and SSIFederalBenefitsEligFor.
Information regarding the type of SSI unit the person belongs to (and hence
which of the medicaid eligibility types -- 12 thru 19 -- to assign to the
person) is passed from the SSI simulation via the rule SSIUnitType
.
As is the case with other SSI-related eligibility, optional eligibility is
denied to persons who fail to meet their state's
"Rule 209b" restrictions (if any).
TANF/AFDC non-UP Eligibility (eligibility type 25)
Under AFDC (and continuing under TANF) states had the option of not providing
benefits (or not providing full benefits) to families with two non-disabled
parents in which the primary wage-earner was unemployed (also called "UP"
units). If the state does not choose to include these families
in their TANF/AFDC program, they still have the option to extend Medicaid
eligibility to these families, via the rule DoesUPEligInNonUPQualForMcaid.
In TRIM3, families with an unemployed head in such a state are eligible if they
pass their state's TANF/AFDC income and asset tests but fail to meet
the state's definition of a single or incapacitated-parent (IP) unit.
Information on whether the TANF/AFDC asset and income eligibility tests are
passed from the TANF/AFDC module via the following rules:
-
AFDCPassAssetTest
-
AFDCPassGrossIncomeTest
-
AFDCPassNetIncomeTest
Information on whether the individual's family qualifies as a single-headed,
UP, or IP unit is passed to the Medicaid module via the rule AFDCPassParentTest.
Percent of Poverty Eligibility (eligibility types 46-49 &
40-41)
States may extend "percent-of-poverty" eligibility by increasing the age,
income, and/or asset limits beyond the minimum mandatory federal
limits. These higher limits can be specified through the following
rules:
-
PovBasedStateAgeForChildren1
-
PovBasedStateAgeForChildren2
-
PovBasedStatePctForChildren1
-
PovBasedStatePctForChildren2
-
PovBasedStatePctForPregnant
-
PovBasedStatePctForInfants
-
PovBasedStateAssetForChildren1
-
PovBasedStateAssetForChildren2
-
PovBasedStateAssetForPrgAndInf
The same measures of income and assets are used as in the federally mandated
tests.
States may also extend percent-of-poverty eligibility to elderly or disabled
individuals. Such persons will be eligible if their income is below the
percent-of-poverty specified by the rules PovBasedStatePctForDisabled and
PovBasedStatePctForElderly, as long as they pass the SSI asset test.
The amount of a person's income is based on the measure used for determining
SSI eligibility, and is passed from the SSI simulation via the rule SSISimulatedAvailableIncome,
while information as to whether they passed the SSI asset test is passed via
the rule SSIPassAssetTest.
Ribicoff Eligibility (eligibility type 20)
A special category of optional Medicaid eligibility for children is the
"Ribicoff" category. Under this category, states can extend Medicaid
eligibility to children under a certain age who pass the state's TANF/AFDC
asset and income tests but are not eligible for benefits because they are in
neither a single-parent family nor in a two-parent family qualifying as IP or
UP (i.e. the child fails the "parent" test).
The age cutoff for Ribicoff eligibility in each state is specified by the rule RibicoffChildrenStateAge.
Information on whether a child passes the TANF/AFDC asset and income tests are
passed via the following rules:
-
AFDCPassAssetTest
-
AFDCPassGrossIncomeTest
-
AFDCPassNetIncomeTest
while information about whether or not the child passes the "parent" test is
passed via the rule AFDCPassParentTest. Prior to version 61, states were given the
option to extend Ribicoff eligibility to children as old as age 20, but the
medicaid module could not simulate eligibility for children who were too old to be
categorically eligible in the TANF/AFDC run used (as indicated via the rule AFDCPersonType
), since the TANF/AFDC module did not supply information about the income and
asset tests for those children. Version 61.0 adds four new program rules:
- RibiPassAssetTest
- RibiPassNetIncome
- RibiPassGrossIncomeTest
- RibiPersonType.
These rules allow users to access another baseline prep TANF run which is identical to the mandatory 1931 run
but with these older children included in the TANF eligibility unit.
The results passed through these new program rules are referred to when the information from the mandatory 1931
TANF run cannot be used to determine Ribicoff eligibility.
Note that after the passage of PRWORA in 1996, the TANF/AFDC tests that the
child must pass are based on 1996 AFDC rules, not the current year's rules.
Thus, for post-PRWORA runs the above information should come from the mandatory
1931 run of the TANF module (which simulates eligibility based on 1996 AFDC
rules), rather than from a current-year run.
1115 Waiver Eligibility (eligibility type 23)
The Medicaid module includes a group of rules sometimes referred to as "Special
State Programs", and at other times "1115 Waivers". These are state-specific
rules that can be used to simulate eligibility criteria for a variety of
people. Generally, these rules are used to simulate eligibility through Section
1115 Waivers, which some states use to expand Medicaid coverage to specific
target populations. To be eligible through this path, individuals must pass the
following tests:
- Categorical Eigibility: The following rules indicate which
demographic groups are categorically eligible:
-
SpecialProgramAdultPct
-
SpecialProgramChildPct
-
SpecialProgramDisabledAdultPct
-
SpecialProgramParentPct
-
SpecialProgramPregnantPct
-
SpecialProgramReporterPct
-
SpecialProgramAnyonePct
A non-zero value for a state indicates that the state has a program for this
group. See the dictionary definition of each rule for a description of the
covered group. Note that none of these groups ever include the elderly.
- Asset Test: During pre-PRWORA simulations (IncomeCalculationType
= 0) asset tests are not applied. For post-PRWORA simulations the asset levels
are specified by the rules SpecialProgramAdultAssetLimit and SpecialProgramParentAssetLimit
(other groups do not have asset tests). Assets are measured using medicaid's
own method.
- Income Test: The value (non-zero) in each of the "SpecialProgram...Pct"
rules specifies the percent-of-poverty cutoff for eligibility. During
pre-PRWORA simulations (IncomeCalculationType = 0) medicaid's own
measure of income is used (note that this is a simplification, but it is
justified given the relatively few states that had 1115 waivers before PRWORA).
For post-PRWORA simulations, the same measure of income is used as in the
mandatory percent-of-poverty tests. Note that the rule SpecialProgramAFDCElig
does not require an income test -- the person simply has to be eligible for
TANF/AFDC .
Note: Before the 1997 TRIM3 Medicaid baseline, rather than
using the above rules to decribe eligibility requirements, specific codes were
assigned to each state to describe their programs via the single rule SpecialStatePrograms.
SCHIP Eligibility
TRIM3 simulates SCHIP eligibility for both children and adults. The rule CHIPOption
controls whether SCHIP eligibility is simulated, as well as what impact other
coverage has on eligibility. This rule applies to the determination of all
forms of SCHIP eligibility -- medicaid extension programs as well as separate
state programs, children as well as adults.
SCHIP and Other Coverage
Depending upon the setting of CHIPOption, persons who are covered by
other types of insurance may not be eligible for SCHIP:
-
Simulate SCHIP, don't deny coverage due to ESI or other government
coverage. Under this setting, other coverage does not affect SCHIP
eliigbility.
-
Simulate SCHIP, deny coverage due to ESI or other governmental coverage.
Under this setting, persons who are covered by employer sponsored insurance
(ESI), Medicare, Champus, or other military health care are ineligible for
SCHIP coverage. Information about these types of coverage are accessed as
follows:
-
ESI: via the program rule ESICoverage
-
Medicare: via the program rule MedicareEnrollment
-
CHAMPUS and other military health care: by direct reference to the input
variable HealthChampusCoverage
This coverage information is supplied on an annual basis. In order to use it in
the determination of monthly SCHIP eligibility, TRIM assumes that a person
reported to be covered by Medicare, Champus or other military health care is
covered the entire year. This assumption is not appropriate for ESI, so TRIM
assumes that a person covered by ESI is covered only in those months when the
head or spouse (not children) of the family are working (i.e. have
positive earnings), regardless of whose employer supplies the coverage.
-
Simulate SCHIP, deny coverage due to ESI or other governmental coverage.
Retiree and COBRA ESI assumed. This setting is the same as the
previous setting except for it's determination of monthly ESI coverage. If the
head and/or spouse of a family have any earnings during the year, monthly ESI
coverage is determined the same as in the previous method (i.e. only those
months with earnings are considered ESI-covered months). However, if neither
head nor spouse has any earnings during the year, TRIM assumes that the
family's ESI coverage comes from a previous employer (i.e. retiree coverage or
COBRA), and therefore considers every month to be an
ESI-covered month.
Note that before version 25_1 (i.e. before the 2000 baseline) if the variable IndianHealthCoverage
indicated coverage, the person was considered to have "other governmental
coverage" (and so was denied eligibility under CHIPOption 2 and 3).
This restriction can be reactivated by turning on DebugOption #2.
Furthermore, prior to version 24_0, "other governmental coverage" was not
considered at all when determining if eligibility is denied. This can be
reactivated by turning on DebugOption #1.
SCHIP for Children (eligibility types 70-73)
TRIM3 simulates the two main types of SCHIP programs for children: programs
that are actually extensions (or expansions) to Medicaid, and programs that are
separate from Medicaid. A state may operate only an SCHIP-funded Medicaid
expansion program, only a separate state SCHIP program, or both. Within these
programs, rules may vary depending upon the child's age, as well as whether or
not a premium is charged for the coverage. To be eligible for SCHIP, a child
must pass the following tests:
-
Categorical Eligibility: Persons are categorically eligible if
they fall into one of two age ranges. All persons in either of the two ranges
are categorically eligible, even if the person is the head or spouse of a
family. Age ranges do not vary between "free" and "premium" programs, but they
do vary between medicaid extension programs and separate state programs. The
following table shows which state-specific program rules are used to indicate
these age ranges.
|
Medicaid Extension Programs |
Separate State Programs |
|
Minimum Age |
Maximum Age |
Minimum Age |
Maximum Age |
Age Range # 1 |
McdExtLowAge1 |
McdExtHighAge1 |
CHIPLowAge1 |
CHIPHighAge1 |
Age Range # 2 |
McdExtLowAge2 |
McdExtHighAge2 |
CHIPLowAge2 |
CHIPHighAge2 |
-
Asset Test: To be eligible, children must pass an asset test.
Just one rule, CHIPAssetLimit is needed to specify the asset limits
for the SCHIP children program (although this rule has separate values for
Medicaid expansion programs and separate state SCHIP programs). The measure of
assets used depends upon the setting of the rule IncomeCalculationType,
which in turn depends upon whether PRWORA rules are being simulated:
-
Post-PRWORA (IncomeCalculationType = 1):
Medicaid's own measure of assets is used.
-
Pre-PRWORA (IncomeCalculationType = 0): The asset
measure calculated for TANF/AFDC eligibility is used, which is passed from the
TANF/AFDC simulation via the rule AFDCAssetsOfUnit. For persons
not members of an TANF/AFDC unit, medicaid's own measure is used.
-
Income Test: The final test for SCHIP eligibility looks at
income as a percent of poverty. The following table shows which program rules
are used to indicate the percent-of-poverty income threshold.
|
Medicaid Extension Programs |
Separate State Programs |
|
Free |
Premium |
Free |
Premium |
Age Range # 1 |
McdExtFreePct1 |
McdExtPremPct1 |
CHIPFreePct1 |
CHIPPremPct1 |
Age Range # 2 |
McdExtFreePct2 |
McdExtPremPct2 |
CHIPFreePct2 |
CHIPPremPct2 |
To measure a person's income, medicaid's own measure is modified by adding any
lump-sum income (LumpSumIncomVars) that is to be treated as income (LumpSumTreatment).
Beginning with version 56.5 of the Medicaid module SSI and TANF/AFDC benefits received by
the family (SSIBenefitsReceived, AFDCBenefitsReceived) are not treated as income.
To include SSI and TANF benefits in income one has to specify Opt #6
in the DebugOptions. This new income amount is then reduced by the
deductions and disregards specified by the following rules (the values for
these rules vary between Medicaid extension programs and separate state
programs, but not between ages):
|
Method for Determining Disregard/Deduction |
Amount to Disregard/Deduct (if applicable) |
Child Care Expenses |
CHIPChildCareDeductOption |
CHIPMaxChildCareDeduct |
Child Support Income |
CHIPChildSuppDisregardOption |
CHIPMaxChildSuppDisregard |
Work Related Expenses |
CHIPWorkExpDisregardOption |
CHIPWorkExpDisregard |
See the dictionary definition of these rules for details regarding how these
rules are applied. Note that in the Medicaid module, these disregards and
deductions are applied to the entire year even if in the "real world" the
disregards are only applied to part of the year (for example, the first four
months).
SCHIP for Adults (eligibility type 74)
TRIM3 simulates adult SCHIP eligibility for three types of adults: parents,
pregnant women, and childless adults. To be eligible for SCHIP, an adult must
pass the following tests:
-
Categorical Eligibility: To be considered a "parent", a person
must be older than 18, be the head or spouse of a family (subfamilies are
considered separately) and have at least one child of their own living with
them who is 18 or younger. A person over 18 who does not meet all these
criteria is classified as a "childless adult". A woman who is pregnant, in
addition to being classified as "pregnant" will also be classified as a
"parent" or "childless adult" if she is over 18. Note that for parents, if none
of their children are eligible for medicaid, the parent will not be considered
for eligibility either.
Some states that offer SCHIP coverage for parents treat caretaker relatives
(over 18) as if they were parents. The program rule CHIPNumCaretakersEligible
indicates for each state whether caretaker relatives are treated the same as
parents, and if so, whether both or just one caretaker can be eligible. To be
considered a caretaker relative, a person must meet the same criteria as a
parent, except that all the children under 18 who are living with them must be
"other relatives" rather then "own children". Regardless of whether all, some,
or none of the caretakers are eligble, all of their collective income
is counted when determining the eligibility of other family members.
-
Asset Test: The asset limits faced by each of these groups of
adults are given by the rules CHIPParentAssetLimit, CHIPPregnantAssetLimit,
and CHIPChildlessAdultAssetLimit. These limits vary by the family
size, up to a size of 4. Assets are measured the same way as for SCHIP
children.
-
Income Test: The percent-of-poverty limits for each of these
groups of adults are given by the rules CHIPParentPct, CHIPPregnantPct,
and CHIPChildlessAdultPct. These percentages vary by whether or
not a premium is charged for the coverage, and (for parents) by whether or not
the person is already a recipient or is a new applicant. Income is determined
in the same way as for SCHIP children, except that when applying deductions and
disregards, only the values for separate state programs are used.
Medically Needy Eligibility (eligibility types 31-34 &
36-37)
States with "Medically Needy" programs cover persons whose income after medical
expenses is under a state-specified threshold. This may include persons whose
income is above the threshold prior to medical costs, but who "spend down" to
below the threshold, as well as persons with very low medical expenses or no
medical expenses whose income is low enough to fall below the threshold.
- Categorical Eligibility: States may choose whether or not to
offer medically needy eligibility. If they do, they must provide
coverage to pregnant women and children who are categorically eligible for one
of the mandatory coverage groups (e.g. categorically eligible for TANF/AFDC or
for the mandatory percent-of-poverty programs). States may choose
to cover additional children under age 21, caretaker relatives, the elderly,
and disabled individuals. The program rule MedicallyNeedyGroups specifies
for each state which of the following groups are categorically eligible:
-
Pregnant women and infants
-
Children categorically eligible for TANF/AFDC
-
Children under a specified age (0 to 21)
-
Caretaker relatives (adults eligible to be aided along with their TANF/AFDC
children)
-
Aged according to SSI rules
-
Disabled according to SSI rules
Membership in the SSI-related groups is based on information passed from the
SSI simulation via the rule SSIPersonType, while membership in the
TANF/AFDC -related groups is based on information passed from an TANF/AFDC
simulation via the rules AFDCPersonType and AFDCPassParentTest
(this may be either a current-year TANF/AFDC simulation or a mandatory 1931
TANF simulation, depending upon whether pre or post-PRWORA rules are being
simulated).
- Asset Test: The rules MedNeedyAssetLimitSize1-MedNeedyAssetLimitSize4
specify the asset limits, based on unit size. For persons in the SSI-related
groups ,the value of assets and the unit size are obtained from the SSI
simulation via the rules SSISimulatedUnitAssets and SSIUnitSize.
For persons in the TANF/AFDC -related groups, while the unit size is obtained
from the TANF/AFDC simulation via the rule AFDCUnitSize, the measure
of assets depends upon the setting of the rule IncomeCalculationType
, which in turn depends upon whether PRWORA rules are being simulated:
-
Post-PRWORA (IncomeCalculationType = 1):
Medicaid's own measure of assets is used.
-
Pre-PRWORA (IncomeCalculationType = 0): The asset
measure calculated for TANF/AFDC eligibility is used, which is passed from the
TANF/AFDC simulation via the rule AFDCAssetsOfUnit. For persons
not members of an TANF/AFDC unit, medicaid's own measure is used.
- Income Test: The rules MedNeedyIncomeLimitSize01-MedNeedyIncomeLimitSize10
specify the income limits, based on unit size. For persons in SSI-related
groups, income and unit size are obtained from the SSI simulation via the rules
SSISimulatedAvailableIncome and SSIUnitSize. Income and unit
size for the TANF/AFDC -related groups are obtained from the TANF/AFDC
simulation via the rules AFDCNetIncomeOfUnit and AFDCUnitSize.
For persons not members of an TANF/AFDC unit, medicaid's own measure is used.
- Spend Down: For both SSI-related and TANF/AFDC -related groups,
the income amount is reduced by an amount meant to approximate the unit's
medical expenses. The medical expense amounts used to simulate this "spend
down" are specified by the rules beginning "AvgMedicaidExpFor...", and
vary by state and user group (children, adults, disabled, and elderly). In a
baseline simulation, if an individual who falls within one of the groups
covered by his/her state's medically needy program reported Medicaid benefits
on the CPS but is not simulated as eligible that month through any of the
non-medically needy rules, TRIM assumes that person has medical expenses high
enough to "spend-down" to within the medically needy income limits. Such
persons are automatically considered by TRIM3 to be income-eligible for the
medically needy program, although they must still pass the asset test to be
considered fully eligible. Such a person is also considered to be
income-eligible for medically-needy coverage due to high medical expenses in
all alternative simulations (assuming that the state is still being modeled as
having a medically-needy program in the alternative).
The Value of Medicaid/SCHIP Benefits
TRIM3 estimates the "insurance value" of Medicaid coverage for each eligible
individual. The imputation of insurance value uses regression equations plus
adjustment factors to hit administrative targets.
Different regression equations are used to estimate insurance values for
different user groups and for different health expenditure categories. The user
groups are: children (under 19, and not head/spouse of a family, and not
pregnant, and not disabled), adults (not disabled, and 19-64 or under 19 but
head/spouse of a family or pregnant), disabled (under 65 and disabled according
to the SSI module's definition), and elderly (anyone 65 or older). The
expenditure categories are: mandatory Medicaid costs, drug costs, long-term
care, home health care, and other costs. (Long-term care and home health care
insurance values are estimated only for aged and disabled persons.) The
explanatory variables include sex, race, age, number of months eligible for
Medicaid during the year, whether living in a rural location, receipt of
TANF/AFDC or SSI benefits, whether eligible for Medicaid under the Medically
Needy program, whether the head of the family or a dependent (for the groups
under age 21 and 21-64). The equations were estimated using actual Medicaid
expenditures from HCFA's "tape-to-tape" data system.
After the regression equations have been evaluated for a particular Medicaid
eligible, adjustment factors are applied. The factors vary by user group,
expenditure type and by state. (They are coded in the state-specific rules
beginning AdjAdult..., AdjAged..., AdjChild..., and AdjDisabled.) The
adjustment factors serve three purposes: simulating the state-level variation
in insurance costs, adjusting for price increases since the year of the data
used to estimate the equations, and aligning to targets. Targets are computed
by user group, state, and expenditure category. (The targets are coded in the
state-specific rules beginning TgtAdult..., TgtAged..., TgtChild..., and
TgtDisabled.) Adjustment factors are established for each year during
that year's baseline simulation.
Determining Enrollment
Monthly Enrollment Decision
For each month that a person is simulated as eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP, a
decision must be made as to whether the person is actually enrolled in the
program in that month. A person may be simulated to enroll in some but not all
of his/her months of eligibility. If a person is simulated to enroll in a given
month, he/she is assigned an "Enrollment Type" value equal to the "Eligibility
Type" value for that month.
During a baseline run, the determination of whether a person enrolls in an
eligible month is made outside of the medicaid module. This requires that a
SAS extract file be created using (among other things) results from a
medicaid run in which all eligibility-related rules have been set to their
baseline values. A series of SAS programs
are then run on this extract, the end result being a file which indicates for
each person whether they enroll in each month. This file must be imported into
TRIM as a supplemental results file for the year being modelled. Once imported,
the VariableList rule BaselineEnrollmentDecision should be set to
point to the variable Enroll from this supplemental results file. When
the medicaid module needs to determine if a person is enrolled in a given
month, it refers to this variable.
Unlike the baseline enrollment decision, the enrollment decision for an
alternative run is made within the medicaid module. Consequently, alternative
simulations can be run without needing to re-do the baseline enrollment
procedure. In an alternative simulation, the monthly enrollment decision for
persons who were eligible in that month in the baseline is the same as the
baseline decision. Information on the baseline decision is obtained from the
same supplemental results file that was used in the baseline run, via the
VariableList rule BaselineEnrollmentDecision. For persons who were not
eligible in that month in the baseline, a logit equation is used to assign an
enrollment probability. However, since the enrollment decision for
newly-eligible persons is made jointly for all newly-eligible members of a
family (subfamilies separate), these person-level probabilities must be
combined into a single family-level probability. The method used to combine
them is specified by the rule NewlyEligEnrProb:
-
Use the maximum person-level probability of enrollment
-
Use the minimum person-level probablity of enrollment
-
Use the average person-level probability of enrollment
The resulting family-level probability is compared to a random number to
determine if all the newly-eligible members of the family enroll in that month.
The coefficients of the logit equation which is used to assign the person-level
probabilties of enrollment to newly-eligible persons during an alternative run
are as follows:
Dummy Variable |
Coefficient |
Medicaid child |
0.106965 |
SCHIP child |
-0.4787 |
Child age 0 |
-0.55867 |
Child age 1-5 |
1.146442 |
Child age 6-12 |
1.052676 |
Child with family income <100% pov. |
1.907145 |
Child with family income 100-200% pov. |
0.492884 |
Adult Medicaid |
1.063281 |
Adult SCHIP |
0.317048 |
Disabled Medicaid |
1.377276 |
Disabled, medically needy |
-0.17506 |
Disabled, age 19-44 |
0.095804 |
Elderly Medicaid |
-0.34152 |
Elderly, with family income <100% pov. |
0.31277 |
The resulting probabilties of enrollment are as follows:
Medicaid Children |
<100% pov |
100 - 200% pov |
200%+ pov |
Child age 0 |
81% |
51% |
39% |
Child age 1-5 |
96% |
85% |
78% |
Child age 6-12 |
96% |
84% |
76% |
Child age 13+ |
88% |
65% |
53% |
SCHIP Children |
<100% pov |
100 - 200% pov |
200%+ pov |
Child age 0 |
70% |
37% |
26% |
Child age 1-5 |
93% |
76% |
66% |
Child age 6-12 |
92% |
74% |
64% |
Child age 13+ |
81% |
50% |
38% |
Adults |
Adult Medicaid |
74% |
Adult SCHIP |
58% |
Disabled Medicaid |
Medically needy |
Not Medically Needy |
Disabled age 19-44 |
79% |
81% |
Disabled age 45+ |
77% |
80% |
Elderly Medicaid |
<100% poverty |
79% |
100%+ poverty |
74% |
For details about how the baseline and alternative methods of enrollment
were developed, click here.
Also, note that prior to the 2002 baseline, monthly enrollment was determined
within the medicaid module. Click here
for details.
Continuous Enrollment
In both baseline and alternative runs, after the initial monthly enrollment
decisions have been made (as described above), the medicaid module simulates
the effect of "continuous enrollment". Continuous enrollment allows a child
(defined as age 18 or younger) to remain enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP for a
certain number of months without requiring the parents to report changes in
income or other circumstances. Thus, under continuous enrollment rules, a child
might be covered by Medicaid or SCHIP in a month when s/he is technically
ineligible based on the family's income in that month.
Three state-specific program rules indicate the number of months of continuous
coverage offered by a state to children in different categories. RepPeriodKidsMcdExceptMedNeedy
gives the months of continuous coverage for children eligible for Medicaid,
with the exception of those eligible as medically-needy; RepPeriodKidsSCHIPMcdExtension
gives the months of continuous coverage for children eligible under
SCHIP-funded Medicaid expansions; and RepPeriodKidsSCHIPSeparate specifies
continuous coverage of children under separate-state SCHIP programs. In
addition, RepPeriodKidsOption
can hold state-specific options that cannot be captured by the standard rules.
If the relevant continuous-coverage rule is set to 1 month, there is no
continuous enrollment. However, if it is set to a number greater than 1,
continuous coverage is simulated. In that case, once a child in that
state/category is initially simulated to enroll in one month, his/her
enrollment is automatically extended to the full continuous-coverage period.
For example, if the rules indicate 6 months of continuous coverage for
non-medically-needy Medicaid children, a child first simulated to enroll in
March will be automatically simulated as enrolled through August. Note that a
child may not be able to "use" all of his/her months of continuous coverage
during the simulation year, if the simulation year ends before the months are
used. Since we do not model the opposite case when a child is eligible in
January due to a spell of continuous coverage that began in the prior year, the
effects of continuous coverage are slightly under-stated.
Note that TRIM3's simulation of continuous enrollment is not affected by the
simulated monthly eligibility status during the months of continuous
enrollment. Once a child covered by continuous enrollment is simulated to
enroll in a particular month, s/he is simulated to enroll for the rest of the
continuous enrollment period, even if s/he is technically ineligible in some or
all of the remaining months in the period. Further, the simulation of
continuous enrollment does not affect the simulated eligibility variables, as
currently programmed. Thus, the output variables might indicate that a child is
both ineligible and enrolled in a particular month. Or, a child might be
simulated as enrolled in Medicaid in a month when s/he is coded as eligible for
SCHIP, but not Medicaid. All such discrepancies in the output variables are due
to continuous coverage.
The current simulation of continuous enrollment does not currently capture some
nuances in the continuous coverage rules. In particular, we do not capture
rules specifying that a child's continuous SCHIP enrollment ends if s/he
becomes enrolled in ESI and/or if s/he becomes eligible for Medicaid.
Annual Enrollment Category
In addition to being assigned an "Enrollment Type" on a month-by-month basis,
persons are also assigned an annual "Enrollment Type" using an "ever-on"
concept - if an individual is enrolled for at least one month, s/he is
considered to be enrolled on an annual basis as well. If the person is enrolled
in more than one month, and the enrollment type varies from month to month, the
types are grouped into the following hierarchy of categories, and the type in
the highest level (i.e. lowest number) is assigned as the annual type (if a
tie, the type from the earliest of the tied months is chosen):
-
Mandatory eligibility: cash recipient
-
Mandatory eligibility: other
-
Optional eligibility
-
SCHIP eligibility
-
Medically Needy
Note that this hierarchy is identical to the hierarchy used for determining the
annual eligibility type. However, since it is possible for a person to be
enrolled in some but not all of their eligible months, the type chosen for the
annual enrollment type may be different from the type chosen for the annual
eligibility type.
Additional Information
Post-PRWORA rule settings
With the passage of PRWORA in 1996, significant changes occurred in Medicaid
eligibility rules for families and children (rules covering aged and disabled
were generally not affected). The primary change was the "de-linking" of
Medicaid eligibility criteria from AFDC (now called TANF) eligibility criteria.
In some cases, the link was completely dropped. In others it was kept but the
criteria were allowed to deviate above or below pre-PRWORA AFDC levels. The
most important of the remaining linkages were created by the new "Section 1931"
of the Social Security Act. Under Section 1931 of the Act, states are required
to provide Medicaid eligibility to low-income families who meet the pre-PRWORA
AFDC income and resource standards and other requirements that were in effect
on July 16, 1996. States are also permitted to diverge from these plans.
To simulate post-PRWORA rules, the rule IncomeCalculationType
should be set to 1, and the following rules should be turned off:
-
AfdcAutoElig
(set to 1)
-
DoesUPEligInNonUPQualForMcaid
(set to 0 for all states)
-
DoesAFDCEligQualifyForMedicaid
(set to 0 for all states)
-
BenefitsUnitEligForBelowMin
(should be an empty list)
In addition, special runs of the TANF/AFDC module that capture each state's
Section 1931 eligibility requirements should be used as input to the medicaid
simulation. Although most states have deviated from the minimum criteria (1996
AFDC eligibility rules) for Section 1931, the basic structure of the
eligibility tests remains the same, so the TANF/AFDC module is best suited to
simulate 1931 rules.
The minimum Section 1931 eligibility criteria are modeled using a "Mandatory"
Section 1931 simulation run of TANF, which is essentially the same as the 1996
baseline AFDC run. The eligibility results of this run are passed to the
Medicaid module via the rule Mandatory1931Eligible. Deviations from
the minimum criteria are modeled using an "Optional" Section 1931 simulation
run of TANF, which incorporates any expansions and/or deviations from the 1996
AFDC eligibility rules. Results of this run are passed to Medicaid via the rule
Optional1931Eligible. The rule Other1931Eligible can be used
to override or supplement the 1931 eligibility indicated by the rules Mandatory1931Eligibile
and Optional1931Eligible
, by specifying special state-level rules for 1931 eligibility.
To simulate the fact that Ribicoff and Medically Needy eligibility are now
linked to 1996 AFDC eligibility, the following rules in the AFDC Info
category should be changed to point to results from a 1996 TANF/AFDC run (in
order to minimize the number of special TANF/AFDC runs required, these rules
were set to point to the Mandatory 1931 run, which is essentially the same as a
1996 AFDC baseline):
-
AFDCPersonType
-
AFDCUnitHead
-
AFDCUnitSize
-
AFDCPassAssetTest
-
AFDCPassGrossIncomeTest
-
AFDCPassNetIncomeTest
-
AFDCNetIncomeOfUnit
-
AFDCPassParentTest
Note: The incorporation of
post-PRWORA rules into the Medicaid module was actually done in two phases. The
first phase encompassed the 1997 and 1998 baselines. In these years states had
not diverged enough from pre-PRWORA eligibility criteria to warrant anything
more than a simplified approach. In these years, while some de-linking from
TANF/AFDC was simulated (IncomeCalculationType set to 1), all the
rules in the AFDC Info category referred to the baseline TANF/AFDC run
(there were no special 1931 TANF runs) and receipt of TANF/AFDC continued to
make a person eligible (AfdcAutoElig set to 0). The rule DoesAFDCEligQualifyForMedicaid
was used to simulate a simplified version of the 1931 rules by either assuming
that they were the same as the state's TANF/AFDC rules for that year (value of
1), or by assuming that they were the same but eliminated the benefit test
(value of 2). The former assumption usually meant that to be eligible, a person
had to pass both the state's need standard and payment standard, while the
latter usually meant that only the need standard had to be passed.
Information from the SSI and TANF/AFDC Simulation
As described elsewhere in this documentation, Medicaid eligibility is sometimes
tied to the SSI program and the TANF/AFDC program. Consequently, the Medicaid
module uses many variables produced by these modules. In general, the SSI
results should come from the current year's baseline SSI simulation, unless the
Medicaid simulation is being run to see the effect on Medicaid eligibility of
changes in SSI rules. The TANF/AFDC results, however, generally come from 3
different TANF runs: the baseline, the mandatory 1931 run, and the optional
1931 run. Below is a complete list of all the rules through which the Medicaid
module receives information from the SSI and TANF/AFDC modules:
SSI:
-
AnnualSSIPersonEligType
-
SSIPersonType
-
SSISimulatedAvailableIncome
-
SSISimulatedUnitAssets
-
SSIPassAssetTest
-
SSIUnitSize
-
SSIUnitType
-
SSIBenefitsEligibleFor
-
SSIFederalBenefitsEligFor
-
SSIBenefitsReceived
TANF/AFDC :
-
From the baseline TANF/AFDC run (unless medicaid is being run to see the impact
of changes in TANF/AFDC rules):
-
AFDCBenefitsReceived
-
AfdcDeemedIncome
-
AFDCBenefitsEligFor
-
AFDCAssetsOfUnit
-
BenefitsUnitEligForBelowMin (only needed for pre-PRWORA simulations and
post-PRWORA simulations using the "simple" (1997-1998) methodology)
-
From the mandatory 1931 TANF run (to simulate the fact that post-PRWORA
Ribicoff and Medically Needy eligibility are linked to 1996 AFDC eligibility).
If simulating pre-PRWORA rules, or post-PRWORA but using the "simple"
(1997-1998) methodology, these should point to the same run as the previous
group of rules:
-
AFDCPersonType
-
AFDCUnitHead
-
AFDCPassParentTest
-
AFDCUnitSize
-
AFDCNetIncomeOfUnit
-
AFDCPassAssetTest
-
AFDCPassNetIncomeTest
-
AFDCPassGrossIncomeTest
-
From the mandatory 1931 TANF run (when simulating 1931 eligibility by a special
TANF run):
-
From the optional 1931 TANF run (when simulating 1931 eligibility by a special
TANF run):
Alternative Simulations
An alternative (or non-baseline) simulation is one that models hypothetical or
proposed rules rather than the actual rules that were in effect in a particular
year. To set up an alternative simulation, do the following:
-
Set the SimulationMode
to zero ("Alternative: Do not calculate gaps").
-
Specify the monthly result variable, EligibilityType from the baseline
medicaid run in the rule BaselineEligibilityType.
-
Specify the annual result variable, AnnualEligibilityType from the
baseline medicaid run in the rule AnnualBaselineEligibilityType.
-
If the old (i.e. in-model) enrollment method is being used, specify the annual
result variable, ReasonForEnrollment from the baseline medicaid run in
the rule AnnualBaselineEnrollmentReason.
-
Starting with version 56_2, when simulating pregnancy, PregnancyOption
should be set to "2", and PregnancyIndicator should refer to the
result variable IsPregnant from the baseline run.
Reporters
For various purposes, the Medicaid simulation needs to know whether a person
should be considered a "reporter"--i.e. did they report being covered by
Medicaid during the CPS interview. This determination is made as follows:
The input variable HealthMedicaidCoverage is created during the
conversion of CPS data to TRIM3 format, and is used by the Medicaid module to
determine if a person is a reporter. Starting with the March 2001 CPS, a
separate variable is created during the conversion (HealthCHIPCoverage)
that indicates reported SCHIP coverage, and is also used by the Medicaid module
(via the rule SCHIPReported) to determine if a person is a reporter.
For details regarding how these variables are created, see the article
Using Health Insurance Coverage Variables
. Due to the likelihood that many persons may be confused as to whether they
are covered by Medicaid as opposed to SCHIP (or vise-versa), the Medicaid
module does not separate reporters into SCHIP-reporters and Medicaid-reporters,
but just treats them all as undifferentiated "reporters". Thus, a child
eligible for either Medicaid or SCHIP is treated as a "reporter" if s/he is
reported to be covered by either Medicaid or SCHIP.
When referenced by the Medicaid module, these variables (HealthMedicaidCoverage
and HealthCHIPCoverage) indicate whether Census considers the person
to be covered. However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the person actually
reported
that they were covered, since Census sometimes imputes (or "allocates") a
positive response to the coverage questions if the person either didn't answer
them or the answer conflicts with other information.
For TRIM3's purposes, such "allocated" persons are not considered covered.
Thus, the next step to determining reporter status is to take those persons who
are indicated to be covered by HealthMedicaidCoverage or HealthCHIPCoverage
and drop out those that had coverage allocated to them. Allocated coverage is
indicated via special variables called "allocation flags". The allocation flag AllocFlagMedicaidCoverage
applies to the variable HealthCoveredMedicaid, the flag AllocFlagCHIP
(specified via the rule SCHIPAllocated) applies to the variable CHIPCoverage,
and the allocation flag HealthOtherPlanTypeImputed
applies to all the "catch-all" questions.
Therefore, if HealthMedicaidCoverage indicates coverage, but AllocFlagMedicaidCoverage
indicates that allocation was done, then the reported medicaid coverage is
ignored. Similarly, if HealthCHIPCoverage indicates coverage, but AllocFlagCHIP
indicates that allocation was done, then the reported SCHIP coverage is
ignored. Note that even if HealthMedicaidCoverage indicates coverage,
and AllocFlagMedicaidCoverage indicates that allocation was not
done, it is still possible that the reporter status was allocated. If HealthCoveredMedicaid
indicates no coverage, then this means the coverage indicated by HealthMedicaidCoverage
was obtained from the "catch-all" questions. In this case, if the "catch-all"
allocation flag HealthOtherPlanTypeImputed indicates that allocation
was done, the reported medicaid coverage is ignored. An additional allocation
flag is available -- AllocFlag665
-- which indicates whether the entire record (rather than just the response to
a particular question) was allocated. If this flag indicates allocation, then
the reporter is also dropped.
Special variables were available before the March 1995 CPS which indicated
whether a child (i.e. person < 15) was covered by Medicaid. Consequently,
when using 1993 or earlier input data, children are considered reporters if
they either pass the above criteria or:
If HealthChildCoveredbyMedic = 1 and AllocFlagMedicChildren not
= 1 and AllocFlagMedicNumberOfChildren not = 1.
The annual output variable IsReporter indicates whether a person was
considered to be a Medicaid reporter by the TRIM3 simulation, and is calculated
for all persons, regardless of their Medicaid eligibility. The monthly variable
IsReporterThisMonth indicates (for reporters) which months TRIM3
imputes the reported coverage to apply to. This is done by assigning coverage
to a number of the eligible months equal to the variable HealthMedicaidMonthsCovered.
If there are more eligible months than HealthMedicaidMonthsCovered,
months are selected by ranking them according to their eligibility category as
follows:
-
Mandatory
-
Optional
-
SCHIP
-
Medically Needy
Months in one category are chosen before months in later categories (e.g.
Mandatory months are chosen before SCHIP months, which in turn are chosen
before Medically Needy months). If HealthMedicaidMonthsCovered = 0, reported
coverage is assigned to all eligible months.
Pregnancy
Although pregnancy is not reported on CPS data, Medicaid eligibility based on
pregnancy may be simulated by TRIM3, based on the value of the rule PregnancyOption
:
-
0: Pregnancy is not simulated
-
1: Pregnancy is imputed within the medicaid module
-
2: Pregnancy information is read in via the rule PregnancyIndicator
Option #1 can only be used during a baseline run. This option imputes pregnancy
to all female family heads and spouses who have an infant (i.e. 0-year old) in
their family. This method of imputation is referred to as the "0-year old"
method. Using this method, the woman is assumed to be pregnant in the months of
April through December. In addition, a woman of child-bearing age (13-44) who
reports receiving Medicaid, but is not simulated to be eligible by any
of the non-pregnancy-based rules, is assumed to be pregnant in the months of
July through December if doing so makes her eligible in at least one of those
months. This method is referred to as the "ineligible reporter" method.
In an alternative run, pregnancy can only be simulated using option #2. When
this option is chosen, the rule PregnancyIndicator should refer to the
monthly result variable IsPregnant produced by the baseline run.
Option #2 can also be used in a baseline run if the user wishes to use an
outside source of pregnancy information.
When using option #1 before version 56_1 of medicaid, the "ineligible reporter"
method of imputation was implemented in a simplified
manner. In addition, if option #1 was used in a baseline run, it also
needed to be used in any corresponding alternative runs, since the result
variable IsPregnant was not set for women imputed to be pregnant by
the "ineligible reporter" method.
Once covered by Medicaid, a pregnant woman must be covered throughout her
pregnancy. Therefore, if eligibility is simulated during one month of the
pregnancy, or the woman is already simulated to be enrolled in Medicaid when
she becomes pregnant, the module assumes the woman is eligible in all
subsequent months of her pregnancy. The woman is assigned an eligiblity type of
42 (eligible due to pregnancy via the mandatory eligibility path) for all
subsequent months of her pregnancy regardless of whether she actually passes
this path's eligibility requirements. The only exception is for months where
the woman is eligible as types 1,3,4,5,6, or 22. For these months the
eligibility type is not changed to 42.
Kinship Care
The rules MedicaidKinshipCareOption and CHIPKinshipCareOption,
in the Kinship Care category of rules control how medicaid measures
income and assets for children who are not living with their parents (i.e.
children under "kinship care"). Normally, the measure used is a family-level
measure (or, when measuring income for medically needy eligibility, a TANF or
SSI unit-level measure). However, these rules provide the option of just
measuring the child's own
assets and income
Note that regardless of the setting of these rules, the normal measure will
always be used if the family's income is above the level specified in the rule KinshipCareCeiling
, or if SSI-based medically needy eligibility is being determined.
|